☢ test - Í

defendant's home under circumstances that were similar to those present when the charged crimes occurred; and involved an act and/or a statement that the jury could reasonably conclude exhibited an intention to commit a crime against the sister that was similar to those committed against the victim.” Butler v. State, 311 Ga.App. 873, 717 S.E.2d 649 (October 6, 2011). Interlocutory appeal in prosecution for aggravated child molestation and related offenses; trial court properly granted State’s motion to admit similar transaction evidence of defendant’s prior conviction for violating the Computer Pornography and Child Exploitation Act. Contrary to defendant’s assertion, “the computer pornography and child exploitation offenses and the crimes charged (child molestation, aggravated child molestation, and aggravated sexual battery) do have a logical connection to each other; the independent offenses involve a ‘lascivious motivation or bent of mind,’ Oller [ v. State, 187 Ga.App. 818, 821(2) (371 S.E.2d 455) (1988)], to determine Butler's motivation or bent of mind to commit the crimes charged. The independent and the charged incidents both involve sexual contact with females under the age of consent. The absence of touching in the independent offenses does not bar admission of the similar transaction evidence to show Butler's lustful disposition toward female children. [Cit.]” Lee v. State, 306 Ga.App. 144, 701 S.E.2d 582 (September 17, 2010). Defendant’s conviction for aggravated sexual battery affirmed; trial court properly admitted evidence of similar offense, committed when defendant was 12 years old. “Although Lee contends that he lacked the capacity to form criminal intent as a 12-year-old, (see OCGA § 16-3-1 (‘[a] person shall not be considered or found guilty of a crime unless he has attained the age of 13 years at the time of the act, omission, or negligence constituting the crime’)), we have held that a defendant's youth at the time of the prior offense is a relevant consideration ‘when deciding if the testimony should be admitted to show lustful disposition and inclination, i.e., bent of mind.’ Stephens v. State, 205 Ga.App. 403, 404(1) (422 S.E.2d 275) (1992). Evidence that Lee bragged about his sexual prowess; demanded that the victim perform oral sex on him; and committed sexual acts with her demonstrated his lustful disposition. These actions were not the ‘faultless act[s] of an innocent child.’ Id.; Gilham v. State, 232 Ga.App. 237, 239(1) (501 S.E.2d 587) (1998) (even though defendant was 12 or 13 at time he committed sexual battery, given his obvious understanding of sexual acts committed, his age did not render similar offense inadmissible).” Corbitt v. State, 301 Ga.App. 665, 688 S.E.2d 642 (November 9, 2009). In prosecution for statutory rape of 13-year old granddaughter, trial court properly admitted evidence of defendant’s indecent exposure conviction for masturbating in front of his 13-year old stepdaughter 17 years earlier. “As this case involves different generations of the same family, the lapse in time between the similar transaction and the charged offenses did not render the similar transaction inadmissible. See Delk v. State, 274 Ga.App. 261, 262-263(2) (619 S.E.2d 310) (2005).” See also Jarvis (September 1, 2004), below and cases collected thereunder; Morgan v. State, 226 Ga.App. 327, 328(1) (486 S.E.2d 632) (1997) (indecent exposure to adult admissible in child molestation case) ; Holland v. State , 310 Ga.App. 623, 714 S.E.2d 126 (July 7, 2011) (in trial for offenses against boys ages 8-13, offense against 17-year old was properly admitted). Cline v. State, 300 Ga.App. 615, 685 S.E.2d 501 (October 27, 2009). In defendant’s prosecution for aggravated sexual battery of his 16 year old daughter, prior offenses against younger girls were properly admitted. Age difference of victims not determinative. Prior offense against girl between six and eight years properly admitted. “‘No Georgia case holds that the difference in age of the victims is alone determinative of similarity. Our precedent consistently holds that it is the totality of the similar facts surrounding the crimes which are properly considered in a similar transaction analysis.’ Payne v. State, 285 Ga. 137, 139, 674 S.E.2d 298 (2009).” Nature of offense. Prior act admissible though it involved having victim touch defendant, while subject case involved defendant touching victim. “[W]hen used for the purpose of establishing Cline's lustful disposition toward young female family members, we discern no clear error in the trial court's conclusion that the two acts were sufficiently similar: both involved young female family members, and both involved inappropriate, sexual touching for Cline's sexual gratification.” Accord, Gresham v. State , 303 Ga.App. 682, 695 S.E.2d 73 (April 13, 2010) (Defendant’s convictions for child molestation and statutory rape affirmed; similar transaction evidence involving 16-year old victim was properly admitted, though she was over the age of consent.); Woods v. State , 304 Ga.App. 403, 696 S.E.2d 411 (June 11, 2010) (rape of two eighteen-year olds properly admitted in trial for aggravated child molestation of 10-year old); Collins v. State , 310 Ga.App. 613, 714 S.E.2d 249 (July 7, 2011) (in prosecution for intercourse with 12-13 year old girl, prior act of anal intercourse with 9-10 year old boy properly admitted; “[t]he mere difference in the victims' ages, sex, and specific acts of molestation did not render the similar transaction inadmissible.”); Kirkland v. State , 334 Ga.App. 26, 778 S.E.2d 42 (September 28, 2015) (under pre-2013 Evidence Code, sexually-explicit conversation and photographs shared with victim’s 10-year-old sister properly admitted as sufficiently similar). Remoteness. Twenty year lapse between offenses goes to weight, not admissibility. “‘This is especially true where the accused spent part of the interval incarcerated,’ Hinton [ v. State, 280 Ga. 811, 818(6), 631