☢ test - Í

Lee v. State, 305 Ga.App. 214, 699 S.E.2d 389 (July 13, 2010). Defendant’s conviction for aggravated sodomy reversed for failure to prove venue. Nurse’s testimony that the case was “an Effingham County” case didn’t prove venue. “[A]t no point did the nurse give any evidence that the crime occurred in Effingham County; instead, he merely confirmed the prosecutor's statements that the ‘victim’ and her ‘case,’ whether legal or medical, had come to Candler Hospital from that county. ‘Such indefinite testimony showing only that it was possible the crime was committed within the jurisdiction of the court is insufficient to establish venue.’ Royster v. State, 108 Ga.App. 269, 270(1) (132 S.E.2d 830) (1963) (emphasis in original).” Bowen v. State, 304 Ga.App. 819, 697 S.E.2d 898 (July 6, 2010). Defendant’s conviction for aggravated stalking affirmed. Venue for aggravated stalking charge properly lay in county where victim received defendant’s letter. Cofield v. State, 304 Ga.App. 165, 695 S.E.2d 696 (May 24, 2010). Defendant’s theft by taking conviction affirmed; evidence supported finding of venue. “In theft by taking cases, venue lies in any county in which the accused exercised control over the property. OCGA § 16-8-11.” Defendant claimed he didn’t exercise control over the rental car in question because he was merely a passenger; Court of Appeals disagrees. “Although Cofield was not driving when police spotted the vehicle, the vehicle had been leased to him, not to the driver. And, even by Cofield's account, he got into the vehicle in Clayton County to get the car back from his friend so he could return it to Enterprise. Cofield remained in the car while he allowed Jones, who had paid ‘for a ride,’ to drive the vehicle to his destination.” Price v. State, 303 Ga.App. 867, 694 S.E.2d 712 (April 7, 2010). Defendant’s convictions for possession of marijuana and Ecstasy with intent to distribute affirmed; evidence supported finding of venue. Actions of county officers “supported a finding that the employees of the Effingham County Sheriff's Office … were acting within their jurisdiction. Moreover, in addition to this evidence, the crime scene unit investigator … testified that the events which led to the charges in this case took place in Effingham County.” Armstrong v. State, 286 Ga. 420, 688 S.E.2d 629 (February 1, 2010). Evidence of venue was sufficient. “Proof of venue is sufficient where the State has submitted a map of the crime scene area into evidence and presented testimony that the crime occurred on a street located in the county in which the defendant is being prosecuted. Radford v. State, 251 Ga. 50(3) (302 S.E.2d 555) (1983); Nguyen v. State, 279 Ga.App. 129(2) (630 S.E.2d 636) (2006). Here, eyewitnesses to the incident consistently stated the shooting took place in the Allgood Terrace ‘circle’ or cul-de-sac. During the State's case in chief, the investigating detective pointed out the Allgood Terrace cul-de-sac on a map and in an aerial photograph, both of which were published to the jury, and the detective specifically identified the crime scene location as being in DeKalb County.” Accord, Wickerson v. State , 321 Ga.App. 844, 743 S.E.2d 509 (May 22, 2013). Scott v. State, 302 Ga.App. 111, 690 S.E.2d 242 (January 25, 2010). Evidence was sufficient to establish venue in defendant’s prosecution for aggravated assault. “Here, the grandmother occupying the home that was struck testified that the street on which the shooting occurred was in Jackson County. ‘The testimony of a single witness is generally sufficient to establish a fact.’ OCGA § 24-4-8. In addition, a Jackson County paramedic responded to the scene of the crime to treat the victim struck by the bullet. A Jackson County officer responded to the ‘be on the lookout’ put out on the vehicle and soon saw the vehicle at a nearby Jackson County location. The four men were incarcerated in the Jackson County jail. ‘In light of the well-settled principle that public officials are believed to have performed their duties properly and not to have exceeded their authority unless clearly proven otherwise, the jury was authorized to find the police officer [and the paramedic] acted within the territorial jurisdiction in which [they] testified [they were] employed....’ (Citations omitted.) [ Chapman v. State, 275 Ga. 314, 317-318(4) (565 S.E.2d 442) (2002)]. Cf. In re: B.R., 289 Ga.App. 6, 9(2) (656 S.E.2d 172) (2007) (however, ‘the investigating officers' county of employment does not, in and of itself, constitute sufficient proof of venue ....’) (punctuation omitted). The totality of the evidence sufficed to show venue in Jackson County. See Payne v. State, 290 Ga.App. 589, 590-591(2) (660 S.E.2d 405) (2008).” Sewell v. State, 302 Ga.App. 151, 690 S.E.2d 634 (January 14, 2010). Evidence was sufficient to establish venue in Fulton County where defendant shot victim in a car between Auburn Avenue and Five Points in Atlanta: “The State established that Auburn Avenue was in Fulton County. Further, there is no dispute that Underground Atlanta and the Five Points Marta Station are also in Fulton County. Although the victim ‘did not know the exact location of the shooting, the logical import of [her] testimony is that the crime scene itself was in Fulton County.’ Turner v. State, 293 Ga.App. 869, 870 (668 S.E.2d 268) (2008). ‘As [Sewell] has offered no evidence to the contrary, we conclude that the State met its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that venue of the crime charged is properly in Fulton County.’ Id.”