☢ test - Í

reasonably selected by trial counsel ‘would have been willing to testify to had he been provided the materials trial counsel allegedly failed to provide.’ [ Schofield v. Holsey , 281 Ga. 809, 813(II), 642 S.E.2d 56 (2007)] Here, we conclude as a matter of law that, in view of what Cook’s expert at trial would have testified to had counsel made him aware of Cook’s [prior] evaluation, there is no reasonable probability of a different outcome.” 2. Habeas court erred in considering hearsay reports of what unpresented witnesses would have testified to. “Although the habeas court made findings based on third-party reports as to what additional testimony the friend might have provided, such reports constitute inadmissible hearsay which will not be considered on appeal. See Waldrip [ v. Head, 279 Ga. 826, 828(II)(A) (620 S.E.2d 829) (2005)] (refusing to consider inadmissible hearsay on appeal despite the absence of any objection); Dickens v. State, 280 Ga. 320, 322(2) (627 S.E.2d 587) (2006) (holding that inadmissible hearsay cannot be used to prove prejudice).” Accord, Daughtry v. State , 296 Ga. 849, 770 S.E.2d 862 (March 27, 2015). Gibson v. State, 291 Ga.App. 183, 661 S.E.2d 850 (April 16, 2008). Aggravated battery and related convictions affirmed. “[T]rial counsel’s failure to present cumulative evidence does not amount to ineffective assistance. Campbell v. State, 281 Ga.App. 503, 504(2) (636 S.E.2d 687) (2006).” Accord, Carlos v. State , 292 Ga.App. 419, 664 S.E.2d 808 (July 2, 2008); Ellis v. State , 316 Ga.App. 352, 729 S.E.2d 492 (June 25, 2012); King v. State , 320 Ga.App. 90, 739 S.E.2d 654 (February 14, 2013); Fleming v. State , 324 Ga.App. 481, 749 S.E.2d 54 (October 2, 2013); Hulett v. State , 296 Ga. 49, 766 S.E.2d 1 (October 20, 2014) (proposed mitigation evidence at capital sentencing trial was cumulative). Knox v. State, 290 Ga.App. 49, 658 S.E.2d 819 (March 5, 2008). Aggravated assault and related convictions affirmed. Trial counsel’s investigation of defendant’s involuntary intoxication defense was not unreasonable; although counsel failed to locate an expert witness, the one who testified at motion for new trial hearing “testified that there was no readily available information on the effects of combining NO2 and alcohol, that he could not find where anybody else had ever researched this question, and that it took him two full working days to reach his conclusions regarding the same. Dr. Dulaney stated unequivocally that an attorney researching the possibility of such a chemical reaction would have been unable to find any information regarding the same. Dulaney further explained that only someone certified as both a pharmacologist and a toxicologist could make that determination, and that he could ‘count on one hand’ the number of people who would be qualified to testify on this issue. Thus, Knox’s own expert established that nothing short of an exhaustive search, requiring extensive research would have allowed trial counsel to find a qualified expert. Under these circumstances, trial counsel’s failure to locate an expert witness qualified to testify in support of Knox’s involuntary intoxication defense did not render his performance deficient.” Noe v. State, 287 Ga.App. 728, 652 S.E.2d 620 (October 3, 2007). No ineffective assistance at defendant’s child molestation trial: witness Tant testified at hearing on motion for new trial “that the victim’s mother told her that the victim had not been molested but that she was mad at Noe for not paying child support and ‘was going to get him back.’” Trial counsel, however, testified that the witness didn’t tell him that before trial, and that “the only information that she provided at the time of their conversation was inadmissible under Georgia’s rape shield statute and was irrelevant to Noe’s defense.” “Trial counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to call Tant as a trial witness since there is no evidence that she informed him of any relevant, admissible evidence before trial.” Accord, Rouse v. State , 290 Ga.App. 740, 660 S.E.2d 476 (April 3, 2008) (No ineffective assistance where counsel failed to call expert witness to testify for defendant; “counsel explained that he did not find the expert’s opinion helpful to the case, and he did not want to have to disclose the expert’s report to the State.”). Gibbs v. State, 287 Ga.App. 694, 652 S.E.2d 591 (October 1, 2007). Defendant received ineffective assistance from trial counsel at his trial for child molestation and related charges. At hearing on motion for new trial, three witnesses testified that they had told trial counsel about prior false allegations of molestation made by the alleged victim against them, and that the victim later recanted the allegations. Trial counsel testified that he didn’t present the testimony because he (erroneously) believed the testimony was excluded by the rape shield law. “[T]his Court has found ineffective assistance of counsel where trial counsel failed to cross-examine a witness regarding her ‘many prior allegations of child molestation.’ Goldstein v. State, 283 Ga.App. 1, 4(3)(a) (640 S.E.2d 599) (2006).” Distinguished, Vaughn v. State , 307 Ga.App. 754, 706 S.E.2d 137 (February 9, 2011) (no ineffective assistance for “failing to do proper follow-up on other cases involving the child victims” where prior allegations not shown to be false). State v. Lamb, 287 Ga.App. 389, 651 S.E.2d 504 (August 31, 2007). In sexual battery prosecution, grant of motion for new trial affirmed; t rial court correctly ruled that defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel. “Trial counsel’s performance was deficient because he failed to obtain [similar transaction witness’s] criminal records.” Responsibility belongs to counsel, although defendant had agreed to obtain the records himself. Compared to “ Tenorio v.